![]() Here, the repeatable chapter structure comes into play, as each chapter presents relevant research and discusses interventions for micro (both individual and group work), mezzo, and macro practice. The body of the work addresses the six types of determinants of active aging. These introductory chapters feature thoughtful consideration of the causes of ageism, an overview of multiple theories of aging, a discussion of the perspectives of older adults, and critiques of the successful or active aging frameworks. The work opens with an introduction to the field of aging (Chapter 1), followed by a detailed treatment of ageism and myths of aging (Chapter 2) and a careful-if somewhat ahistorical-presentation of the active aging model (Chapter 3). Its structure neatly incorporates contemporary pedagogic devices, including introductory learning objectives case studies and “occupational profiles” key terms, critical thinking questions, and activities and a repeatable chapter structure. ![]() 64).ĭesigned as a text for gerontological social work practice courses, the book is chock-full of useful material and innovative ideas. Their stated aim is to bring the values and ethics of social work to bear on a new “actively aging” framework for practice that also incorporates “the experiences and perspectives of older adults” (p. In this volume, Chonody and Teater have adapted the WHO model for teaching gerontological social work practice. It identified six types of “determinants” of active aging that might be influenced by public policy (health, behavioral, personal, social, economic, and physical), as well as two “cross-cutting determinants” (gender and culture). This model introduced three pillars of active aging: health, participation, and security. ![]() In 2002, the World Health Organization (WHO) published its Active Aging Policy Framework for the second United Nations World Assembly on Aging in Madrid. The phrase “active aging” surfaced in Europe during the 1990s as a framework for developing policies to promote the labor force participation of older adults ( Foster & Walker, 2014). Cited as one of gerontology’s “greatest hits,” the work has spawned multiple variations on the theme, including “productive aging,” “positive aging,” “healthy aging,” and others ( Pruchno, 2014). by Cicero, but came into its own in 1987 when John Rowe and Robert Kahn published their seminal article in Science. Journal of Gerontological Social Work is cited by a total of 665 articles during the last 3 years (Preceding 2022).The possibility of “successful aging” was articulated as early as 44 B.C. It is used for the recognition of journals, newspapers, periodicals, and magazines in all kind of forms, be it print-media or electronic. The ISSN of Journal of Gerontological Social Work journal is 15404048, 01634372.Īn International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) is a unique code of 8 digits. ![]() The best quartile for this journal is Q2. SJR acts as an alternative to the Journal Impact Factor (or an average number of citations received in last 2 years). It considers the number of citations received by a journal and the importance of the journals from where these citations come. SCImago Journal Rank is an indicator, which measures the scientific influence of journals. The overall rank of Journal of Gerontological Social Work is 9616.Īccording to SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), this journal is ranked 0.539. Journal of Gerontological Social Work is a journal covering the technologies/fields/categories related to Nursing (miscellaneous) (Q2) Social Sciences (miscellaneous) (Q2) Social Work (Q3). About Journal of Gerontological Social Work ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |